In the days the Dutch have just settled America we find a young midwife who has a child-birth go wrong. Everybody seems to think she is a witch and especially the newly arrived pastor (a great Guy Pierce) seems ominous.
Liz and the pastor appear to have a past which is further elaborated in the second part of the film. An unexpected plot-line unfolds which is explained more in the third part. This is wonderfully done.
“Brimstone” shows early American settlers of the extremely religious type and well shows the pressure this religion brought, or at least, how it was used. The story-line of Liz and the pastor makes a gloomy red thread through the film which culminates in a fourth part which wraps up the story.
Taking two-and-a-half hours the Dutch director tells his horrible story in a great, international way, giving both an idea of these days, its religion and telling a story of tension.
God’s Pocket is a small town with not too highly educated inhabitants and a bit of maffia like social structures. When the son from someone the outside dies and a newspaper journalist starts to stir in the pot, tensions occur.
“God’s Pocket” is a descent drama with some familiar faces such as Philip Syemour Hoffman, John Torturro and Caleb Landry Jones.
This film is only rated 5.6 on IMDb which I find a bit low. I may not be Clooney’s best, but “Suburbicon” is an enjoyable film.
The title refers to a newly found and perfect American community where people from all over the States come to live to flee their previous surroundings. In this quiet town two things happen. One man (played by Matt Damon) gets a “Fargo”-like plan to raise money, which of course goes very wrong. The second event is a colored family coming to live in Suburbicon.
Clooney wrote the story together with the Coen brothers. This shows in the story and Clooney again uses the Coen-style filming and 1950’ies setting that he used in previous films.
The result is, like I said, an entertaining film. Not as good as Clooney’s debut, but certainly not his least interesting film either.
Elvis Presley gets the idea that he could do something for his country when he can work against society-undermining groups such as criminal organisations, drug dealers, communists and the like. In order to do that he wants to work as an undercover federal agent. He tries to set up a meeting with Nixon to arrange that.
The film indeed is about that very meeting, but much more about what lead to it. We see Elvis as a person with sometimes quirky ways of thinking, but oftentimes as an intelligent person. He tries to use his fame to get what he wants, but he is quite patient in his efforts. On the other side, two young people from the presidential staff try to arrange the meeting, but Nixon initially does not want to hear about it.
This results in an amusing film in which Michael Shannon plays Elvis and Kevin Spacey Nixon. Both do not look too much like the persons they play, but they perform their roles wonderfully.
I am not sure how this film came on my watchlist, but I may have been looking for films with Frances MacDormand. Besides her, we also have Willem Dafoe and Gene Hackman.
Dafoe is a young FBI agent who is sent to Mississippi with his senior partner Hackman to investigate the disappearance of three young activists. They come to a small community in which the Ku Klux Klan reigns supreme and the FBI stirring up the status quo leads to a massive increase of violence against the black half of the population.
Parker shows the hatred of the whites towards the black and the powerlessness of the blacks in a disturbing way. Unbelievable that there are people who think and act in such a way. Of course towards the end all major clan-members are put to trial and convicted, but this was not exactly an easy process.
A very good film about a very black page in American history.
What a weird film! In the first scenes a woman is abducted, drugged and hypnotised apparently for some experiment. The kidnapper seems to have other strange experiments. Later we find Kris back at her house where it soon becomes unclear if the events actually took place.
After this she runs into a young man. Was he her abductor, was he a victim of the same man or is the whole film built of suppressed memories of either of them?
“Upstream Color” appears to be a collection of scenes that either or not have something to do with each other. The film does not really appear to tell a coherent story. I usually do not mind that, but in this case I have the feeling that there might be a story that I fail to grasp.
The film is slow, meditative and fairly minimalist. It is alright, but the vague impression it made, prevents me from saying that it is good. Perhaps I should just watch it again some day.
The lauded film about Alan Turing who created a machine to crack the continuously changing Enigma code of the Nazis and thus devising the first computer.
British intelligence agencies gathered the best decoders, linguists and mathematicians to crack the Nazi code so they could be a step ahead and win the war. This was quite a task and Turing came up with the idea to not try to crack the code and having to do the same the next day when the code was changed, but to make a machine that figures out the settings that the Nazis changed every day.
The director turned the story of the troubled Turing into a nicely developing film.
In the 1940’ies America and Russia were on friendly foot. One of the political parties in America was the Communist Party. When the relations between the two countries went down and the Cold War began, Communism suddenly became a threat to American society and a witch-hunt for (alleged) communists started.
We follow Dalton Trumbo (Bryan “Heisenberg” Cranston), who was a successful Hollywood script writer and also a communist. He and some of his colleagues and friends stuck to their political beliefs which caused them to be put in jail. After he got out, Trumbo thought up an elaborate plan to show that communists are not dangerous people trying to overthrow the government.
The film shows the grades of political convictions. Trumbo was some sort of ‘capitalist communist’ with his massive villa, while some of his friends were more radical. The shades disappeared and were replaced by white and black, right and wrong, and the people in power brainwashed the general audience to try to get rid off the menace called Communism.
“Trumbo” makes a nice film about a strange part of American history showing how caution can lead to hysteria which on its turn can lead to total neglect of the constitution.
I very common, but descent police drama. Robert de Niro is a detective who is put on a case in which a drug dealer was killed and dumped into a river. The prime suspect turns out to be his son. So we get a fairly typical police film with some extra drama.
Besides De Niro we also see Frances McDormand and a daughter of Robert de Niro.
Certainly not a must-see, but also not a waste of time.
Burton made a very ‘normal’ film, a drama about Margaret who has a very distinctive style of painting children with big eyes. She flees her first husband, soon runs into her second. This second husband proves fairly good in promoting her art, but under his own name…
In the 1950’ies we see a woman who tries to be independent but society is not ready for independent women so she keeps living under male domination. Until she decides to bring out the truth that is!
“Big Eyes” is an alright drama, but nothing really out of the ordinary.